Alston Healthcare

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Earl Howe on 28 June (WA 215) concerning the Alston Healthcare project, what measures are in place to monitor grants to the organisation; who conducts the monitoring; and when.

Earl Howe: The Department of Health monitors these grants according to standard procedures drawn up in consultation with HM Treasury.
	Measures include the scrutiny of annual audited accounts and receipted invoices.

Asylum Seekers

Lord Hylton: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will request the UK Border Agency to take account of the report by the Centre for the Study of Emotion and Law when considering the experiences in this country of asylum applicants; and whether they will change the rules for assessing applicants who have suffered torture or sexual abuse.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The UK Border Agency is aware of the work of the Centre for the Study of Emotion and Law and that it has published a number of reports, most recently The Psychology of Seeking Protection in 2009. This report focused on existing psychological models that might be of relevance to the proceedings of refugee law and asylum decision-making.
	This report will not lead directly to any rules changes concerning victims of torture or sexual abuse within the asylum system being made by UKBA since it was, on the centre's own admission, tentative and pending further research. UKBA nevertheless remains open to suggestions for improvements.

Aviation: Per-plane Duty

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Sassoon on 30 June (WA 278) concerning the possibility of introducing a per plane duty to replace the per passenger duty, which organisations and individuals have made representations to them on that issue.

Lord Sassoon: Treasury Ministers and officials have meetings with a wide variety of organisations in the public and private sectors as part of the process of policy development and delivery. As was the case with previous Administrations, it is not the Government's practice to provide details of all such meetings.

Bank of England

Lord Myners: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether (a) the Financial Stability Board, and (b) the Financial Stability Committee, are committees of the Bank of England; whether both committees are chaired by the Governor of the Bank of England; and whether the Governor also sits on the Financial Stability Board established by the G20.

Lord Sassoon: The Bank of England has a Financial Stability Executive Board. This is a working level committee, chaired by the Deputy Governor for Financial Stability (Paul Tucker). The Governor may attend meetings. The Financial Stability Committee was established by the Banking Act 2009 as a committee of the Court of the Bank and, by statute, is chaired by the Governor. The Governor is not a member of the Financial Stability Board established by the G20; the Deputy Governor for Financial Stability attends this committee.

Banking: Iceland

Lord Myners: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the judgment of the Supreme Court of Iceland on 16 June on the legality of loans indexed to foreign currencies will affect the recoverability of sums owed to United Kingdom institutions and creditors, including HM Treasury, charities and local authorities.

Lord Sassoon: The effect that Iceland's Supreme Court judgment (dated 16 June 2010) has on the claims that UK institutions and creditors have in relation to Icelandic banks is still being examined by the authorities in Iceland. The relevant authorities will advise creditors in due course of the impact, if any, on projected recoveries from the estates of the failed Icelandic banks.

Banks

Lord Myners: To ask Her Majesty's Government which banks, investment banks and banking trade associations were contacted by ministers, senior officials and special advisers in Her Majesty's Treasury on 22 and 23 June.

Lord Sassoon: Treasury Ministers and officials have discussions with a wide variety of organisations-including banks, investment banks and banking trade associations-as part of the process of policy development and delivery.
	As was the case with previous Administrations, it is not the Government's practice to provide details of all such discussions.

Community Broadband Network Ltd

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Wilcox on 10 June (WA 55), whether they will place in the Library of the House a copy of the annual returns and financial statements for 2007 and 2008 of Community Broadband Network Ltd supplied on 1 December 2009 to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) and released in Freedom of Information case 10/1065 on 18 June 2010; why two years' annual returns and financial statements were requested on 27 and 30 November 2009 by BIS when no returns had been registered by the Financial Services Authority between 31 December 2005 and 8 December 2009; and what due diligence was undertaken on receipt of the annual returns and financial statements.

Baroness Wilcox: For simplicity I will place in the Library of the House all documents released in that Freedom of Information case 10/1065 on 18 June 2010.
	As regards the other questions, it is an established convention that Ministers of one Administration cannot see the documents of a previous Administration. I have nothing further to add to my previous Answers provided at Hansard 15 June 2010 (col. WA104), 15 June 2010 (col. WA 105).

Community Broadband Network Ltd

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Henley on 24 June (WA 203) about Community Broadband Networks Ltd, how much the Question would cost to answer; who made the calculation that the cost would be disproportionate; and on what basis the calculation was made.

Lord Henley: The Countryside Agency was abolished in 2006. It became readily apparent that ex-Countryside Agency records could take considerable time and resources to access and search. Additionally, the detailed information requested would require extensive input from the Community Broadband Network (CBN). We have now established a contact within the CBN who has been able to provide the information within cost. The answers, based entirely on Defra's own records of its contractual arrangements with CBN and their advice, are as follows:
	What measures were in place to verify the £30,000 and £42,500 paid by the Countryside Agency and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs respectively to Community Broadband Network Ltd (CBN Ltd) in 2004 and 2005 to support a mentoring scheme for local broadband projects?Defra and the Countryside Agency received regular monitoring reports from Ruralnet Ltd and CBN Ltd in relation to the community broadband mentoring and support scheme, covering both activities and expenditure.To whom those moneys were allocated by CBN Ltd?The scheme providing mentoring, online expert help and other support activities was initially run by Ruralnet UK. A team of 34 mentors was recruited and moneys were allocated following acceptance of reports on mentoring visits. Ruralnet is no longer in existence, so further details are no longer available.How many mentor man days were provided by CBN Ltd, giving the costs in each instance?Ruralnet and CBN provided 58 mentor-days, dealt with 38 experts' online requests and provided 83 training places. Further breakdown of costs is not available.How the £8,000 paid by the Countryside Agency to CBN Ltd to support part of the development of the CBN website was allocated.Funds for website development were allocated as part of a contract for services to Lindsey Annison, an independent contractor.What tendering process was employed by CBN Ltd for the website development?Website development was not tendered separately from other services.Whether they will place all details and audit reports on those grants in the Library of the House?No audit reports were undertaken by Defra. CBN's audited accounts are lodged with the Financial Services Authority. We will arrange for copies of information to be placed in the Library of the House.

Community Broadband Network Ltd

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will investigate the statement of Mr Malcolm Corbett, chief executive officer of the Community Broadband Network Ltd, that from 2004 it had acquired 200 members when the governing board declared in its annual return to the Financial Services Authority (FSA) 4, 8, 10, 12 and 12 members for the years 2004 to 2008 respectively; and why from those records filed with the FSA they have not carried out an investigation.

Baroness Wilcox: The Government have no plans to investigate. Any evidence of wrongdoing should be presented to the appropriate authorities.
	The FSA's role under the Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1965 (the 1965 Act) is that of registering authority. Under the 1965 Act there are very limited powers and scope of investigation for the FSA other than where an application is received from a prescribed number of members. Section 48 of the 1965 Act enables the FSA to require a society to provide documents and information but only where the FSA is considering cancelling a society's registration on particular grounds, such as a society not fulfilling the conditions of its original registration.

Crime: Domestic Violence

Baroness Scotland of Asthal: To ask Her Majesty's Government what percentage of police overtime is spent attending incidences and repeat incidences of domestic violence; and what the cost of such cases is to the police.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The information is not collected centrally.

Democratic Republic of Congo

Lord Alton of Liverpool: To ask Her Majesty's Government how much they have spent on (a) the protection of human rights activists, journalists and political activists, and (b) promoting respect for human rights, in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Lord Howell of Guildford: We are deeply concerned at the increasing intimidation and violence faced by human rights defenders, journalists, parliamentarians, and civil society in Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). In addition to raising individual cases of concern we continue to press the Government of DRC bilaterally and with our EU partners to meet their responsibility for protecting human rights.
	We have provided funding through the Africa Conflict Prevention Pool to the UN peacekeeping force in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUSCO) protection fund which supports human rights defenders.
	Additionally we provide bilateral support to projects promoting human rights. We are currently in the process of assessing new proposals and will be allocating funding to successful projects in the coming weeks. In 2009-10 we contributed £14,048 to the UN peacekeeping force in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC) protection unit which provides protection services to those in danger including relocation and advice on personal security.
	We also funded a number of projects for the promotion of human rights including:
	contributing £23,578 to REJEER, a children's rights non-governmental organisation (NGO), to fund a leaflet aimed at children to explain their rights under the 2009 Child Protection Law; and.spending £1,322 to arrange a screening of a film on sexual and gender-based violence to members of the DRC Parliament.
	We are also contributing £11 million over five years to a media fund jointly administered with France and Sweden which supports local media organisations and NGOs including Journalists in Danger which campaigns for freedom of the press.

Democratic Republic of Congo

Lord Alton of Liverpool: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they plan to allocate additional funding for promoting respect for human rights in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Lord Howell of Guildford: We are deeply concerned at the human rights situation in Democratic Republic of Congo. We have provided funding through the Africa Conflict Prevention Pool to the UN peacekeeping force in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUSCO) protection fund which supports human rights defenders.
	Additionally we provide bilateral support to projects promoting human rights. We are currently in the process of assessing new proposals and will be allocating funding to successful projects in the coming weeks.

Democratic Republic of Congo

Lord Alton of Liverpool: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their assessment of the political situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Lord Howell of Guildford: The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) celebrated 50 years of independence on 30 June. It is a relatively more secure country than it has been over the last decade. Despite ongoing localised violence, eight of the 11 provinces are generally stable. However there remain serious challenges, not least bringing peace and stability to the east of the country and holding elections in 2011.
	The Independent Electoral Commission (CEI) in DRC announced on 14 April that general elections would take place according to the constitution by September 2011, and local elections after that in December 2012. We welcome the announcement of an electoral timetable; but we have expressed our disappointment at this further postponement of local elections.
	The UK has promised over US$ 42 million and has already spent over US$ 14 million on voter registration for the DRC elections. We will continue to press the Government of DRC bilaterally and with our international community partners to make progress on preparations for the elections.
	We also continue to urge the government of the DRC to make clear what kind of support it expects from MONUC and the international community for the elections.

Democratic Republic of Congo

Lord Alton of Liverpool: To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the number and identity of religious leaders, journalists, opposition leaders and political and human rights activists who have allegedly been harassed, abused or tortured by security forces, imprisoned by the Government, or assassinated, in the Democratic Republic of Congo in the past 12 years.

Lord Howell of Guildford: Human rights defenders, journalists, members of civil society, and parliamentarians continue to face harassment and violence. We receive reports of abuses against civil society and parliamentarians from a number of sources including our contact with local non-governmental organisations, Congolese MPs, the UN Human Rights Office, and the EU human rights group.
	We will continue to follow up cases of concern and press-both bilaterally and with our EU partners-the Government of the Democratic Republic of Congo to take action.

Democratic Republic of Congo

Lord Alton of Liverpool: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have sought to co-ordinate with the governments of Belgium, France, Canada, the United States, Sweden and Germany representations to the Government of the Democratic Republic of Congo about alleged harassment and assassination of journalists, opposition activists and human rights activists.

Lord Howell of Guildford: We are deeply concerned by the increasing violence against human rights defenders, parliamentarians, journalists and members of civil society in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). We follow cases of concern very closely and will continue to press-bilaterally and with our EU partners-the Government of DRC to meet their responsibility for protecting human rights and freedom of expression.
	We agreed with our EU partners a statement of concern at the death of the human rights defender Floribert Chebeya by the EU High Representative Baroness Ashton. We also provide £11 million to a media fund jointly administered with France and Sweden to support professionalisation, regulation, and the economic viability of the media in DRC. Funding goes to local media organisations and non-governmental organisations including Journalists in Danger which campaigns for freedom of the press.
	We are committed to working with our international partners in DRC through the UN, and we are members of the International Contact Group on the Great Lakes Region in Africa whose members include Belgium, France, and the US.

Democratic Republic of Congo

Lord Alton of Liverpool: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their assessment of progress towards peace in the eastern and north-eastern provinces of the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Lord Howell of Guildford: The overall situation in the Kivus in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is significantly more stable than 18 months ago. The Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) have been weakened through Congolese military action and ongoing UN efforts to demobilise them. But they are not defeated and are still carrying out pillaging, killing and kidnapping. The Armed Forces of the DRC (FARDC) are also guilty of human rights abuses. However there is evidence to suggest that the FARDC carry out fewer abuses when they are working closely with the UN peacekeeping force to DRC (MONUSCO), and receiving regular pay and rations.
	The political and military integration process for the ex-National Congress for the Defence of the People (CNDP) and former armed groups is fragile. Regular and accurate pay (appropriate to rank) is still a problem. We will continue to monitor the situation and encourage all parties to remain committed to the full implementation of the peace process.
	In Orientale Province North Eastern DRC, the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) continues to carry out regular killings and abduction of civilians. UN Security Council Resolution 1925 provides MONUSCO with an increased focus on targeting the LRA, including the co-ordination of strategies with other UN missions and providing logistical support for military operations.

Education (School Premises) Regulations 1999

Baroness Thornton: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the outcome of the most recent six month review of the Education (School Premises) Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/2) relating to toilet and water provision.

Lord Hill of Oareford: The department is reviewing its capital programme to ensure that when we build schools in future we do so in a more cost-effective and efficient fashion. As part of this we will take into account the work that was carried out before the election in reviewing the 1999 School Premises Regulations on toilet and drinking water provision in schools.
	We will consult on any proposals and announce our plans in due course.

Embryology

Lord Walton of Detchant: To ask Her Majesty's Government what was their expenditure on (a) embryonic stem cell research, (b) adult stem cell research, and (c) all stem cell research, in each of the past five years.

Baroness Wilcox: Government spend on stem cell research since 2004-05 has been as follows:
	
		
			  Adult Embryonic Adult*/Embryonic **Other Total 
			 2004-05 £10,609,978 £10,600,627 £176,000 £10,619,058 £32,005,663 
			 2005-06 £11,953,661 £13,133,278 £550,000 £18,134,527 £43,771,466 
			 2006-07 £17,569,647 £17,524,179 £855,000 £25,603,329 £61,5_52,155 
			 2007-08 £24,890,344 £15,982,863 £1,162,000 £18,006,185 £60,041,392 
			 2008-09 £29,228,480 £16,758,018 £1,157,000 £16,148,191 £63,291,689 
		
	
	*A number of research projects involve both adult and embryonic cell types
	** Not all organisations have been able to provide a breakdown in the categories requested.

Embryology

Lord Walton of Detchant: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether scientific discoveries derived from stem cell research have been translated into clinical trials of treatment of disease; and, if so, how.

Earl Howe: Though most focus is on regenerative medicine, stem cells have been used in tissue grafting and transplant medicine for many decades, including bone marrow and umbilical cord blood transplantation, corneal transplantation and skin grafting. In addition stem cells have also played a crucial role in tissue engineering, such as the successful windpipe transplant.
	The Medical Research Council (MRC), one of the Government's main agencies for supporting biomedical and clinical research, has funded a number of early phase clinical trials in 2009, which aim to investigate stem cell technologies to develop treatments for eye disease, chronic myeloid leukaemia and Addison's disease. One further study aims to use stem cell technologies to treat bone fractures. The MRC and the Californian Institute of Regenerative Medicine also aim to bring stem cell treatments to the point of clinical trials within the next four years, for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration and acute myeloid leukaemia. Further information on these studies is available on the MRC's website at: www.mrc.ac.uk/Newspublications/News/MRC006229 and www.mrc.ac.uk/Newspublications/News/MRC006435
	The Department of Health has asked the National Health Service Blood and Transplant Authority to lead on a strategic review of the use of stem cells from bone marrow and umbilical cord blood, which are mainly used in the treatment of life threatening blood disorders such as leukaemia and anaemia. It is due to report its findings this month.

EU: Food Labelling

Lord Stoddart of Swindon: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their stance on the European Union proposal on the standardising of food labels reported to ban the sale of eggs by number.

Earl Howe: Current rules allow a number of foods, including eggs, to be sold by number. I am advised that it is not entirely clear in the Commission proposal for a food information regulation how the quantity of pre-packed food items is to be declared. The United Kingdom will continue to seek amendments to the text which will allow selling by number to continue.

European Commission: Media

Lord Stoddart of Swindon: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their stance on the European Commission paying journalists to accompany the President of the Commission and other Commissioners on media-sensitive meetings and missions.

Lord Howell of Guildford: This is a matter for the Commission. However, the UK believes that the EU should deliver more for less. We will oppose all wasteful EU spending.

European Commission: Staff

Lord Marlesford: To ask Her Majesty's Government what representations they will make to the European Commission on the proposal that the remuneration and normal entitlements of its staff should increase by 5 per cent to €2.26 billion for 2011.

Lord Howell of Guildford: The Commission's draft budget for 2011 indicates that remuneration and normal entitlements of staff will increase by 5 per cent to 2.26 billion euros in 2011. This reflects the funds for increased staff costs due to staff upgradings, and in-year and expected future salary adjustments.
	The draft budget is a Commission proposal only at this stage. The Council and European Parliament will spend the next five months negotiating it in detail, and we will not therefore know the final level of the EU's budget until the end of this year.
	The Government believe that the 2011 estimates for the administration heading proposed by the Commission must be reduced, and closely scrutinises all bids for higher administration costs. The Government are arguing that payments in the 2011 EU Budget should remain at cash levels equivalent to the 2010 budget.

Fishing: Common Fisheries Policy

Lord Pearson of Rannoch: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Henley on 29 June (WA 264), which other European Union countries support their proposed reform of the common fisheries policy; which are opposed to it; and what system of voting would apply to proposals for reform.

Lord Henley: There is broad agreement across the EU about the case for reform, including the need to decentralise and simplify the current complex regulations. Few, if any, member states support the status quo, though views vary as to the changes needed.
	Ordinary legislative procedure would apply to a legislative decision on reform, meaning that both the Council of the European Union, and the European Parliament, would need to approve reform proposals, according to the voting rules and procedures in the relevant treaty provisions; most particularly Articles 231, 238, 289 and 294 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and Article 16 (and the attached protocol on transitional provisions) of the Treaty on the European Union.

Food: Chicken

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Henley on 8 June (WA 36), how much chicken meat has been imported from (a) the European Union, and (b) non-European Union countries, in the past three years; which were the top five countries from which the United Kingdom imported the largest amounts in the last year; and whether they will consider proposing changes to World Trade Organisation rules that prevent them banning imports on the ground of the welfare standards applying in third countries.

Lord Henley: The table below shows the amount of chicken meat imported into the UK from EU and non-EU countries as recorded in the Official Overseas Trade Statistics for the period 2007-09.
	
		
			 UK imports of chicken meat, 2007-09 
			 Thousand Tonnes 
			 EU/Non EU Type 2007 2008 20091 
			 EU Chicken meat (inc offal)2 317 274 270 
			  Chicken meat products and reparations3 67 69 62 
			 EU Total  384 343 332 
			 Non EU Chicken meat (inc offal) 23 22 24 
			  Chicken meat products and preparations 109 135 139 
			 Non EU Total  132 157 163 
			 Grand Total  516 500 495 
		
	
	(c) Crown Copyright
	Source: HM Revenue and Customs
	Data prepared by Trade Statistics, Economics and Statistics Programme, Defra
	1 2009 data are subject to amendments.
	2 Chicken meat (inc. offal) includes fresh, chilled or frozen carcase meat (whole birds), cuts and offal (inc. liver).
	3 Chicken meat products and preparations includes prepared, preserved, salted or cooked chicken meat and offal (inc. liver).
	The table below shows the top five countries from which the UK imported the largest amounts in the past year.
	
		
			 Top five countries from which the UK imported chicken meat in 2009 
			   Thousand Tonnes 
			 Type Country of dispatch 20094 
			 Chicken meat(inc offal)5 Netherlands 147 
			  Irish Republic 24 
			  Poland 21 
			  Belgium 21 
			  France 18 
			 Chicken meat products and preparations6 Thailand 119 
			  Netherlands 22 
			  Brazil 15 
			  Irish Republic 13 
			  Germany 6 
		
	
	(c) Crown Copyright
	Source: H M Revenue and Customs
	Data prepared by Trade Statistics, Economics and Statistics Programme, Defra
	4 2009 data are subject to amendments.
	5 Chicken meat (inc. offal) includes fresh, chilled or frozen carcase meat (whole birds), cuts and offal (inc. liver).
	6 Chicken meat products and preparations includes prepared, preserved, salted or cooked chicken meat and offal (inc. liver).
	World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules do not allow members to ban imports on the grounds of the welfare standards applied in third countries. The UK continues to work with the European Union and the WTO membership to advocate high animal welfare standards and is working to include a provision for animal welfare in the WTO Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement.

Health: Costs

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Earl Howe on 14 June (WA 68), what were the amounts and overall totals for healthcare costs paid to and by relevant European Union countries under European Social Security Regulations 1408/71 and 574/72 in the past five years; and what are the current costs per head agreed for each of those countries and the United Kingdom.

Earl Howe: The total published European Economic Area (EEA) medical costs for 2004-05 to 2008-09 are set out in table 1, broken down from 2005-06 by country in table 2. A breakdown by country is not available for years prior to 2005-06.
	The latest published average costs for each EEA member state is set out in table 3.
	
		
			 Table 1 
			 EEA Medical Costs: Resource Outturn Totals 2004-05 to 2008-09 
			 Member State Claims Against United Kingdom 
			 UK Claims Against Member States 
			 Financial Year Member State Claims UK Claims 
			 2004-05 £381,500,000 £31,200,000 
			 2005-06 £465,400,000 £35,100,000 
			 2006-07 £527,900,000 £38,100,000 
			 2007-08 £630,400,000 £45,900,000 
			 2008-09 £709,500,000 £47,300,000 
		
	
	Notes:
	1. Totals are based on estimates of the costs of European Economic Area (EEA) healthcare claims made annually for the purposes of provisions made in the Department of Health accounts in accordance with Treasury resource accounting rules.
	2. Totals are rounded to nearest £100,000.
	Source: Resource Accounting and Budgeting (RAB) exercise.
	
		
			 Table 2 
			 EEA Medical Costs: Resource Outturn Totals 2005-06 to 2008-09 (by Country) 
			 Member State Claims Against UK 
			 UK Claims Against Member States 
			  2005-06 Member State Claims 2005-06 UK Claims 2006-07 Member State Claims 2006-07 UK Claims 
			 Austria £2,726,000 £474,000 £2,956,000 £539,000 
			 Belgium £2,943,000 £2,182,000 £3,768,000 £2,902,000 
			 Bulgaria £0 £0 £0 £0 
			 Cyprus £4,204,000 £0 £11,366,000 £0 
			 Czech Republic £0 £0 £0 £0 
			 Denmark (Waiver) £0 £0 £0 £0 
			 Estonia (Waiver) (2) £0 £0 £0 £0 
			 Finland (Waiver) (3) £0 £0 £0 £0 
			 France £67,977,000 £3,312,000 £83,003,000 £3,798,000 
			 Germany £5,204,000 £16,000 £5,630,000 £925,000 
			 Greece £616,000 £807,000 £857,000 £401,000 
			 Hungary (Waiver) (3) £0 £0 £0 £0 
			 Iceland £30,000 £9,000 £33,000 £9,000 
			 Ireland £296,812,000 £20,742,000 £289,194,000 £21,145,000 
			 Italy £5,406,000 £4,034,000 £5,480,000 £3,848,000 
			 Latvia £0 £0 £0 £0 
			 Liechtenstein £0 £0 £0 £0 
			 Lithuania £0 £0 £0 £0 
			 Luxembourg (4) £0 £0 £0 £0 
			 Malta (Waiver) (3) £0 £0 £0 £0 
			 Netherlands £4,763,000 £1,699,000 £4,913,000 £1,953,000 
			 Norway (Waiver) (3) £0 £0 £0 £0 
			 Poland £0 £0 £0 £0 
			 Portugal £1,137,000 £3,000 £1,375,000 £0 
			 Romania £0 £0 £0 £0 
			 Slovakia £0 £0 £0 £0 
			 Slovenia £0 £0 £0 £0 
			 Spain £70,624,000 £1,081,000 £117,452,000 £1,805,000 
			 Sweden £687,000 £773,000 £684,000 £754,000 
			 Switzerland £2,284,000 £0 £1,223,000 £0 
			 Total £465,400,000 £35,100,000 £527,900,000 £38,100,000 
		
	
	Notes:
	1. Totals are based on estimates of the costs of European Economic Area (EEA) healthcare claims made annually for the purposes of provisions made in the Department of Health accounts in accordance with Treasury resource accounting rules.
	2. Excepting Article 22.1c (patient referral) and Article 55.1c (industrial injury) claims.
	3. Excepting Article 22.1c (patient referral) claims.
	4. Previously waiver, regulations apply from 30 June 2008.
	5. Country totals are rounded to nearest £1,000, overall totals to nearest £100,000.
	6. Sub-totals may not add up to totals due to rounding.
	7. Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia joined the EU on 1 May 2004.
	8. Bulgaria and Romania joined the EU on 1 January 2007.
	Source: Resource Accounting and Budgeting (RAB) exercise.
	
		
			 Table 2 (Continued) 
			 EEA Medical Costs: Resource Outturn Totals 2005-06 to 2008-09 (by Country) 
			 Member State Claims Against UK 
			 UK Claims Against Member States 
			  2007-08 Member State Claims 2007-08 UK Claims 2008-09 Member State Claims 2008-09 UK Claims 
			 Austria £2,615,000 £710,000 £3,167,000 £604,000 
			 Belgium £4,186,000 £2,920,000 £5,646,000 £2,122,000 
			 Bulgaria £71,000 £0 £111,000 £0 
			 Cyprus £4,751,000 £0 £5,916,000 £5,000 
			 Czech Republic £233,000 £0 £329,000 £11,000 
			 Denmark (Waiver) £0 £0 £0 £0 
			 Estonia (Waiver) (2) £0 £0 £0 £0 
			 Finland (Waiver) (3) £17,000 £0 £4,000 £0 
			 France £136,112,000 £5,586,000 £154,540,000 £5,047,000 
			 Germany £12,795,000 £1,277,000 £15,198,000 £1,226,000 
			 Greece £3,567,000 £90,000 £5,072,000 £616,000 
			 Hungary (Waiver) (3) £0 £11,000 £0 £8,000 
			 Iceland £153,000 £0 £124,000 £25,000 
			 Ireland £303,221,000 £21,624,000 £331,162,000 £24,488,000 
			 Italy £9,932,000 £5,294,000 £8,649,000 £6,280,000 
			 Latvia £27,000 £0 £20,000 £0 
			 Liechtenstein £3,000 £0 £4,000 £0 
			 Lithuania £15,000 £0 £19,000 £0 
			 Luxembourg (4) £0 £0 £242,000 £0 
			 Malta (Waiver) (3) £0 £0 £0 £0 
			 Netherlands £6,678,000 £2,805,000 £7,952,000 £2,610,000 
			 Norway (Waiver) (3) £0 £0 £0 £0 
			 Poland £754,000 £0 £1,045,000 £17,000 
			 Portugal £2,795,000 £54,000 £2,171,000 £183,000 
			 Romania £16,000 £0 £10,000 £0 
			 Slovakia £59,000 £0 £415,000 £0 
			 Slovenia £218,000 £236,000 £152,000 £64,000 
			 Spain £136,931,000 £4,116,000 £162,014,000 £2,830,000 
			 Sweden £1,361,000 £1,159,000 £1,359,000 £1,071,000 
			 Switzerland £3,920,000 £67,000 £4,138,000 £62,000 
			 Total £630,400,000 £45,900,000 £709,500,000 £47,300,000 
		
	
	Notes:
	1. Totals are based on estimates of the costs of European Economic Area (EEA) healthcare claims made annually for the purposes of provisions made in the Department of Health accounts in accordance with Treasury resource accounting rules.
	2. Excepting Article 22.1c (patient referral) and Article 55.1c (industrial injury) claims.
	3. Excepting Article 22.1c (patient referral) claims.
	4. Previously waiver, regulations apply from 30 June 2008.
	5. Country totals are rounded to nearest £1,000, overall totals to nearest £100,000.
	6. Sub-totals may not add up to totals due to rounding.
	7. Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia joined the EU on 1 May 2004.
	8. Bulgaria and Romania joined the EU on 1 January 2007.
	Source: Resource Accounting and Budgeting (RAB) exercise.
	
		
			 Table 3 
			 EEA Medical Costs 
			 Member State Average Cost (Latest Published) (1) 
			  Year Currency Article 94 (2) Article 95 (3) 
			 Austria 2008 EURO 1,855.72 4,681.70 
			 Belgium 2007 EURO 1,448.77 4,775.84 
			 Bulgaria  BGN N/A N/A 
			 Cyprus 2005 EURO 602.05 816.63 
			 Czech Republic 2008 CZK 14,035.48 42,632.29 
			 Denmark  DKK N/A N/A 
			 Estonia 2008 EEK 6,200.71 14,970.08 
			 Finland 2005 EURO 1,140.04 3,799.91 
			 France 2007 EURO 2,216.92 5,202.72 
			 Germany 2007 EURO 1,153.25 4,558.33 
			 Greece 2006 EURO 1,086.47 2,169.08 
			 Hungary 2008 HUF 83,528.00 260,448.00 
			 Iceland  ISK N/A N/A 
			 Ireland 2004 EURO 3,527.51 6,789.44 
			 Italy 2007 EURO 2,351.73 2,773.24 
			 Latvia 2007 LVL 255.01 320.07 
			 Liechtenstein 2008 CHF 4,300.95 9,197.40 
			 Lithuania 2008 LTL 1,007.87 2,726.71 
			 Luxembourg 2007 EURO 2,594.83 8,432.37 
			 Malta 2006 EURO 543.98 1,479.27 
			 Netherlands 2007 EURO 1,804.86 9,212.14 
			 Norway 2008 NOK 40,650.00 73,392.00 
			 Poland 2005 PLN 709.36 2,203.05 
			 Portugal 2007 EURO 999.79 1,845.42 
			 Romania  RON N/A N/A 
			 Slovakia 2005 EURO 317.25 977.77 
			 Slovenia 2008 EURO 663.97 1,835.16 
			 Spain 2008 EURO 1,283.27 3,491.45 
			 Sweden 2007 SEK 15,353.20 43,515.81 
			 Switzerland 2008 CHF 2,680.15 7,088.55 
			 UK 2007 GBP £1,820.42 £3,368.98 
		
	
	Notes:
	1. There are no published average costs for Bulgaria, Denmark, Iceland and Romania.
	2. Dependants in home state.
	3. Pensioners and dependants.

Health: Stoma Care

Lord Marlesford: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will maintain or enhance the level of community stoma care services in the National Health Service.

Earl Howe: It is for National Health Service organisations to commission and deploy stoma care services in accordance with their local needs.

Human Rights

Lord Lester of Herne Hill: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they continue to share the view, expressed in paragraph 4.15 of the White Paper Rights Brought Home (Cm 3782), that the provisions of the Seventh Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights "reflect principles already inherent in our law"; and, if so, whether they will ratify the Seventh Protocol.

Lord McNally: As I indicated in my Written Answer of 10 June (Official Report, col. WA 57), the Government are currently considering this issue and will take a decision in due course.

Independent Networks Co-operative Association Ltd

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government on what dates the Permanent Secretary, the Director Information Economy, the Director of Communications, Content Industries Directorate, and the Head of Broadband Policy and Programmes at the Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS) became aware that an employee of BIS requested BT become a financial contributor to or sponsor of Independent Networks Cooperative Association Ltd; and whether that financial contribution will reduce the amount of the grant offer of up to £150,000 from BIS before 30 June 2010.[HL950]-
	To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Wilcox on 1 July (WA 299), which companies were requested by an official of the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills to sponsor or finance Independent Networks Co-operative Association Ltd since its formation; for what purpose; and on what dates.

Baroness Wilcox: Officials from the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills have not requested companies to sponsor the Independent Networks Co-operative Association Ltd.

Independent Networks Co-operative Association Ltd

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government what due diligence was carried out by officials at the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills into the reasons for the departures of Malcolm Corbett and Shaun Fensom from Poptel Ltd and The Phone Co-op Ltd before grants were paid to Community Broadband Network Ltd and Independent Networks Co-operative Association Ltd.

Baroness Wilcox: I have nothing further to add to previous Answers on this subject, provided at Hansard 9 June (col. WA 46-47), 10 June (col. WA 55), 15 June (col. WA 104), 15 June (col. WA 104), 15 June (col. WA 103-04), 15 June (col. WA 105), 15 June (col. WA 105), 15 June (col. WA 104), 15 June (col. WA 103), 15 June (col. WA 103) and 16 June (col. WA 119).

Legislation

Baroness Goudie: To ask Her Majesty's Government what process is used to decide on the commencement of uncommenced legislation; who makes such decisions; and how they are made public.

Lord McNally: Decisions to commence legislation are made by the relevant Secretary of State on a case-by-case basis. When considering the appropriate date for commencement, the Secretary of State will take into account all relevant factors, including for example the impact of the timing of commencement on the general public, legal practitioners or court proceedings.
	Wherever possible, legislation which impacts on business, for example health and safety, work and pensions, or company and consumer legislation, will be commenced on "common commencement dates"-at the start of the financial year, 6 April, or on 1 October.
	Where commencement of provisions is the responsibility of the devolved authorities, it will be for those bodies to decide on the timing of commencement.
	All commencement orders are approved and signed by or on behalf of the relevant Secretary of State. They are then registered by the Office of Public Sector Information and published by the Stationery Office. Commencement orders are made available to Members of the Houses of Commons and Lords in the Vote and Printed Paper Offices and to the public via the OPSI website, generally within three days.

Ministry of Defence: Headquarters

Lord Morris of Manchester: To ask Her Majesty's Government what was their original estimate of the cost of reconstructing the headquarters of the Ministry of Defence; how much has been spent on the project; and what they now estimate will be the final cost.

Lord Astor of Hever: The physical redevelopment of the Ministry of Defence (MoD) main building was completed under a private finance initiative project in July 2004 at a cost of £323 million (VAT exclusive). The project as a whole included the provision and operation of decant accommodation for the duration of the main building works and for the ongoing provision of serviced office accommodation in both the main building and Old War Office building until 2030. The original forecast outturn cost of the entire project was £2.25 billion; the current estimate is £2.46 billion and as at June 2010, £576 million has been spent on the project. The MoD now plans to dispose of the Old War Office building after it becomes fully surplus to requirements in 2013, which should reduce the final outturn.

National Insurance

Baroness Hollis of Heigham: To ask Her Majesty's Government what additional revenue would come from (a) employers, and (b) employees, if the upper earnings limit for national insurance contributions were to be abolished.

Lord Sassoon: There is no upper earnings limit on national insurance contributions for employers.
	The additional amount of revenue that would be raised from the removal of the upper earnings limit for employees paying class 1 national insurance contributions and the upper profits limit for self-employed individuals paying class 4 contributions is estimated to be around £11 billion in 2010-11.
	This figure would be reduced to around £6 billion once behavioural effects of taxpayers are taken into account. This estimate is consistent with the Office for Budget Responsibility's Budget 2010 assumptions set out in Annexe C of the Budget document: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/junebudget_annexc.pdf. However, given the scale of the change, the behavioural impact is subject to some uncertainty.

Natural England

Baroness Byford: To ask Her Majesty's Government how many advisers and lobbyists are employed by Natural England in (a) the United Kingdom, and (b) Europe.

Lord Henley: Natural England does not employ the services of any lobbying companies or advisers.

Parkland: Soil Contamination

Lord Lester of Herne Hill: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether there is epidemiological evidence linking soil concentrations of lead, arsenic or other poisonous substances in Mudchute Park in East London or other public parks that would justify hindering or interfering with public access to and enjoyment of such parks.

Lord Henley: Responsibility for identifying contaminated land and, where necessary, ensuring that such land is remediated falls to local authorities under Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990.
	In 2006, Defra gave a capital grant of £70,940 to the London Borough of Tower Hamlets to investigate potential land contamination at Mudchute Park Farm to establish whether or not the land posed sufficient risk to qualify as contaminated land under the 1990 Act. The department is not aware of the outcome of this investigation, including whether or not any relevant epidemiological evidence exists. However, Defra would not normally hold such detailed information relating to specific sites, and you may wish to redirect your question to the London Borough of Tower Hamlets.
	The department is not aware of any relevant epidemiological evidence relating to parks more generally. It is possible that land contamination at individual parks could pose sufficient risk to justify actions that might affect public access to and enjoyment of such parks. However, as with any land potentially affected by contamination, each site would need to be investigated separately to establish whether contamination is present and what the risks are. This is a matter for local authorities under the 1990 Act.

Parliament Square

Lord Eden of Winton: To ask Her Majesty's Government what recent discussions they have had about the present condition of Parliament Square.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The care and management of Parliament Square Garden is the responsibility of the Greater London Authority under the GLA Act 1999.
	The Home Office is discussing with the GLA its plans to restore public access to Parliament Square Garden in the light of the recent judgment at the High Court.

People Trafficking

Lord Hylton: To ask Her Majesty's Government who is responsible for monitoring the effectiveness of procedures for identifying trafficked adults and children.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The UK signed the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings in March 2007, ratified it in December 2008, and implemented it from 1 April 2009. At the centre of the convention is a duty to meet minimum standards concerning the identification and protection of victims of trafficking called the national referral mechanism (NRM). To meet this obligation a government-led, multi-agency framework was created to help identify and support victims.
	The coalition Government are currently reviewing monitoring arrangements. The responsible Minister of State in the Home Office has offered to write to the noble Lord when the review is complete.

Police: Stop and Search

Lord Ouseley: To ask Her Majesty's Government what action they propose to address the proportion of police stop and searches of black and Asian people.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the reasons for the increased rates of black people being stopped and searched by the police compared to white people.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have assessed the likely consequences for race relations and equality, especially police/community relations, if the different proportions of police stop and searches of black people and white people continues.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government what advice and guidance applies to the use of stop and search by police; and whether there is specific advice on how to avoid biased or unjustified stops.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The Government share the concerns about disproportionality in the use of stop-and-search powers. We are working with the police service to help ensure that stop-and-search powers are used appropriately. There is, however, no single cause of disproportionality. It is important, therefore, to look at levels of disproportionality, and any specific demographic or other factors, in individual forces.
	The National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA) has developed Next Steps, a diagnostic tool to ensure that a force's use of stop and search is not driven by other unjustified factors such as discrimination or stereotyping. NPIA will support forces to implement Next Steps and will target forces with high levels of disproportionality. We are about to start the roll out of Next Steps in Dorset, Merseyside and one borough of the Metropolitan Police.
	Detailed guidance on the appropriate use of stop-and-search powers are contained in the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 Code of Practice A. This includes the fundamental principles governing stop and search, which are that the powers must be used fairly, responsibly, with respect for people being searched and without unlawful discrimination. In 2005 the national Stop and Search Manual was published jointly by the Home Office, the Association of Chief Police Officers and the Association of Police Authorities. The manual gives further detailed good practice, training packages and supervision techniques and looks at what should be done to address issues around the disproportionate use of stop-and-search powers.
	In addition to this, police forces have their own operational advice and guidance which will address local stop-and-search and community issues.

Quangos

Lord Greaves: To ask Her Majesty's Government which central Government quangos they have announced their intention to abolish; and how much will be saved in each case in (a) the current year, and (b) future years.

Lord Taylor of Holbeach: The Government have already announced plans to abolish the British Educational Communications and Technology Agency, the Qualifications and Curriculum Development Agency and the General Teaching Council for England. The coalition agreement also announced plans to abolish the Government Office for London, the Standards Board and the Infrastructure Planning Commission. It announced that regional development agencies would be replaced with local enterprise partnerships. The list of remaining quangos to be abolished is not yet finalised
	On 24 May the Chancellor and Chief Secretary to the Treasury announced that savings from these reforms, plus additional savings from departments, will total around £600 million in 2010-11.
	A primary aim of the planned public bodies Bill is to increase the accountability of public bodies, but we also expect that abolitions and mergers arising from the Bill will create savings in future years and departments will be incorporating initial savings into their spending review plans.

Saudi Arabia

Lord Ahmed: To ask Her Majesty's Government what representations they will make to the Government of Saudi Arabia to address alleged discrimination against women, minorities such as the Shi'a in Eastern Province, Ismailis in Najran, and Suffis in Mecca, and labourers from other religions and ethnicities.

Lord Howell of Guildford: We remain deeply concerned about the human rights situation in Saudi Arabia. We will continue to make it clear to the authorities our concerns at ministerial, ambassadorial and working level. In particular, we have concerns over the use of the death penalty, women's rights, the quality of judicial procedure, the rights of foreign workers and discrimination against ethnic and religious minorities, such as the Shia in the Eastern Province, Ismailis in Najran and Suffis in Mecca. While we welcome limited progress in some of these areas, we will continue to use bilateral opportunities to raise our concerns to the Saudi Government, and will continue to work with partners to make sure the EU does the same.

Schools: Academies

Lord Alton of Liverpool: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will grant approval for proposals for new schools in the Academies programme from the boards of education of Church of England, Roman Catholic and other faith-based organisations, using their traditional admissions policies; whether such schools will be permitted to make it a criterion of staff appointments that applicants uphold the Christian faith by their belief and conduct; and whether church bodies will be able to bid to build and run new schools where there is an identified need on the traditional voluntary-aided model, rather than as an Academy.

Lord Hill of Oareford: The Secretary of State will consider each free school proposal on its merits, and take into account all matters relevant to that proposal. This will include proposals from boards of education of the Church of England, Roman Catholic and other faith-based organisations. All free schools will be required to comply with the school admissions code and have inclusive admission arrangements.
	Because of this we wish to ensure that free schools are open to the broadest possible range of local children. New faith academies have previously been set up on the presumption that they will admit 50 per cent of their intake without reference to faith and we will continue to require this for all new faith academies and free schools. This will also apply to independent schools converting to academy status.
	Faith groups will continue to be able to propose to establish a new voluntary-aided faith school using the established statutory process for maintained schools. Similarly, an independent faith school will continue to be able to use the established statutory process to propose joining the maintained sector as a voluntary-aided school.
	The Equality Act 2006 and the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 sets out that voluntary-aided schools are permitted to take faith into account when appointing teachers. They may only take faith into account in appointing non-teaching staff if they are able to demonstrate that there is a genuine occupational requirement for the member of staff to be of the faith. Free schools, like academies, will also be permitted to take faith into account when appointing teachers. They may also take faith into account in appointing non-teaching staff if they are able to demonstrate that there is a genuine occupational requirement for the member of staff to be of the faith.

Smoking

Lord Stoddart of Swindon: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Earl Howe on 1 July (WA 303), whether they have compiled any clinical evidence to support the claim that 10,700 deaths annually are caused by passive smoking.

Earl Howe: The department has not compiled further evidence to support the figure of 10,700 deaths annually caused by passive smoking. This figure, which was included by the Royal College of Physicians in March 2010 in its report Passive Smoking and Children, is entirely in line with the clearly established evidence from across the world about the harm to health from second-hand smoke.

Superannuation Act 1972

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they plan to amend or repeal Section 2(3) of the Superannuation Act 1972 as it relates to trade unions having to agree reductions in pensions.

Lord Taylor of Holbeach: The Government will make it clear that the 1972 Superannuation Act protects accrued rights to pensions.

Timber

Lord Hylton: To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the value of timber, whether round or sawn, purchased in each of the past three years by (a) Government departments, and (b) local authorities.

Lord Henley: From 1 April 2009 all timber and timber-derived products purchased by UK Government departments, agencies and non-departmental public bodies must comply with the UK Government's timber procurement policy. Only legal and sustainable or FLEGT licensed timber and wood products should be purchased.
	The UK Government are committed to reporting better on their timber purchases and in July 2009 Defra published a study looking at this aspect. The report is available on the Central Point of Expertise on Timber (CPET) website with the recommendations. www.proforest.net/cpet/files/CPET%20Reporting% 20pilot%20study%20July%2009.pdf/view.
	The report showed that implementation of reporting requirements across mandated bodies is not currently possible, as data are not held centrally. Assurance of implementation and compliance with the policy should, however, be a first step towards achieving meaningful data.

Vehicles: Automatic Plate Recognition

Lord Corbett of Castle Vale: To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they will take to ensure that the Association of Chief Police Officers fully consult local authority councillors, community leaders and MPs before automatic number-plate recognition cameras are installed in areas as part of counter-terrorism initiatives paid for by the Terrorism and Allied Matters fund which the association administers.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The Government will never compromise the safety and security of the British public but neither will we sacrifice their civil liberties for their security.
	The Government see a need to re-examine the balance between liberty and security and, as part of this broader agenda, are looking closely at the regulatory framework for both CCTV and automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) systems. Work is currently under way with a view to bringing forward proposals as soon as possible.

Voluntary Sector

Lord Ouseley: To ask Her Majesty's Government what role the community-led voluntary sector will play in the policies set out in Building the Big Society; and what effect public expenditure reductions will have on its role.

Lord Taylor of Holbeach: The big society vision is that more power and opportunity are shifted to individuals and communities. The voluntary and community sector will have a fundamental part in making this a reality.
	The Government recognise that there will be difficulties in the current economic climate but aim to promote and support the role of the sector in providing services. For example, we will create an independent big society bank to unlock hundreds of millions of pounds of new finance for social enterprises, charities and voluntary organisations. We will also set up the community organisers' programme which will identify, train and support 5,000 people who want to make a difference to their community over the lifetime of this Parliament. Complementing this, the community first programme is a new fund that will encourage more social action by new and existing neighbourhood groups.